Specifically, the
“Today’s favorable Panel vote brings us one step closer to providing more heart failure patients with advanced treatment options that are proven safe and effective and can significantly improve survival and quality of life,” said
While certain NYHA Class II patients are already indicated for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to protect them from sudden cardiac arrest, they are still vulnerable to experiencing an exacerbation of their heart failure. However, a growing body of clinical evidence suggests that earlier intervention with CRT-D can decrease the risk of morbidity and mortality in this mildly symptomatic patient population. CRT-D therapy works by resynchronizing the contractions of both ventricles by sending tiny electrical impulses to the heart muscles, which improves the heart’s blood-pumping ability. The device also has defibrillation capability, allowing for termination of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.
“As was seen in the RAFT and REVERSE trials, clinical evidence demonstrates that CRT-D prevents hospitalization and can save lives in mildly symptomatic patients,” said
RAFT Clinical Trial
Findings from the landmark RAFT clinical trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, showed that CRT-D significantly reduced mortality for mildly symptomatic heart failure patients (NYHA Class II) by 29 percent when compared to patients treated with guideline-recommended implantable ICDs and medical therapy (p=0.006; HR=0.71). The study also demonstrated a significant reduction (27 percent) in combined mortality and heart failure hospitalizations for this population (p=0.001; HR=0.73), consistent with previously published studies. All patients were followed for at least 18 months, and had an average follow-up of 40 months, making it the longest follow-up and largest patient months-of-experience of any study of CRT therapy.
REVERSE Clinical Trial
With 610 patients studied, REVERSE was the first large-scale, global, randomized, double-blind trial to demonstrate the impact of CRT in mild heart failure patients or asymptomatic patients who previously had heart failure symptoms. All of the randomized subjects received a Clinical Composite Response at 12 months. The Clinical Investigation Plan pre-specified that a comparison would be made between subjects with CRT and those without. The results showed that 21 percent of subjects without CRT worsened, compared with 16 percent with CRT (p=0.10).
In a post-hoc analysis, more patients in the trial improved with CRT than without (54 percent vs. 40 percent, respectively). The Clinical Composite Response measure for heart failure consists of several different endpoints, including death, hospitalization for heart failure, crossover to the opposite arm due to worsening heart failure, a progression to a worsened NYHA class, or a moderate or marked worsening of the patient’s self-assessment (administered by the blinded clinician). Furthermore, the analysis of secondary endpoints in the REVERSE trial showed that CRT leads to improvement in both cardiac structure and function as measured by echocardiography, meaning the heart size improves and beats more effectively. In an additional analysis, REVERSE also demonstrated that CRT delayed the time to first heart failure hospitalization in this patient group and reduced hospitalization or death by 51 percent.
The use of Medtronic CRT-D devices for mildly symptomatic heart failure patients (NYHA Class II) is investigational and not an approved use in
About
Any forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties such as those described in Medtronic’s periodic reports on file with the
Source:
Medtronic, Inc.
Public Relations:
Christopher Garland, 952-905-6805
or
Investor Relations:
Jeff Warren, 763-526-1621